|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 4
|
SCO VS. FREE
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 A mediocre size business has a couple of issues. They have a dual pentium 2 machine with raid that their current version of SCO doesn't support. they would have to upgrade to the latest version of SCO which could cost numerous amounts of money. On the other hand they have a choice of linux, which is free, more widely supported, and can run a lot more software than SCO at faster speeds. They have mental issues deciding if its worth risk to switch. NOW WHATS YOUR ISSUE? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/HN8fat0UyfWoyfMRAt3kAJ4wP/KToj/6DV0/1Yt9YfAOiBnaKwCdGS+j HcNTShJrVLJGYXaojLp98ig= =G9oR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Last edited by thebeta3; 07-22-2003 at 03:05 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 4
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 ok here is my personal opinion. I think linux is the way to go. If these guys can handle SCO, they can more than likely handle linux. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/HOArat0UyfWoyfMRAjgBAJsG35u3fWooGEvBHd9QVkvj4jkCLA CeIQ3/ IohTRjQvgFJwcMKWe/nj//0= =JzvJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Last edited by thebeta3; 07-22-2003 at 03:09 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
PCTT Articles
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Barcelona, SPAIN
Posts: 1,018
|
SCO is using any means to get some money; nothing more. Their claims have not been proved (not yet, even they say 500 ppl that signed NDAs saw proves, that still says nothing to the rest of the world.) Their threats are based on allegations not yet proved. There is nothing, zero, empty, null. How can they sell licenses for Linux? Pay or we may sue you based on nothing, whoa, this is ludicrous... BTW, SCO released a Linux version (under GPL) that is still available on their ftp with source code (read latest IBM allegations.)
In the very unlikely case that they can prove that code has been illegally copied into Linux 2.4 and 2.5, it's just a matter of time until this code is rewritten and released as Linux 2.6. In any case SCO looses. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
mediatechie.com
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 809
|
btw.. what does SCO stand for and what do they do??
__________________
http://mediatechie.com Leave me a message in my shoutbox! ... would appreciate the feedback! thanks people! ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|