|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
The Grim Reaper!
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 2,387
|
Hmm. I cannot load the link (probably some temp problem with ISP
). Did he succeed to take any results? About a week or two ago the shots he gave were just from BIOS and he mentioned that he needed something (gosh my memory is giving me up) and when he got it he would be able to make some tests.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Member Type Guy
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 501
|
He did. Later on in the thread, he posted some, but he had to lower the clock some. Still, I think he was up to 5.8GHz or so still stable.
I don't think it's physically possible to be stable much faster than that... the electronic impulses don't have enough time to cross the chip. Yeah, just think about that for a second.
__________________
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GB/G/H/J/MC/S d-(--)@ s+:+ a-- C !U--- P--- L--(-) E- W N-(--) !o K--- w++ O--- M--(--) V-- PS+ PE+ Y+ PGP- t-- 5-- X- R(+) tv(++) b-- DI+ D---- G- e+++ h-- r* y++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ ![]() Yeah, my computer sucks. You try and do better. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Da House Nerd
Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: One CPU Lane
Posts: 3,512
|
Quote:
__________________
Linux virusscanner detected a virus: Windows 95 ... delete [Y/n] y ~ ~ :wq |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5
|
Then Macci got still the record at 6.2 GHz. Or didn't he got benches too?
__________________
Specifications |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|