|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: New Joisey
Posts: 110
|
I must say the overclocking article you have done has been alot easier than any that I have seen. Mainly I think the reason AMD has not clocked our chips at a higher speed is because it would probably require better cooling, and god knows AMD provides the lowest line of heatsinks available when you buy a processor.
Shame on them. I just hope you don't push that chip so high that the transistors fuse together. Then your screwed. I think I might give it a try though. Maybe turn my XP1600 into an XP 1800 or 2000... Maybe more! Who knows!!! Good job on the article man. Nice work.
__________________
signatures are stupid so I am not going to have one. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: PA
Posts: 1,465
|
I was just getting ready to make a post to let everyone know it has been added and I seen you have posted about it
. I tried to write it the best I could, I'm definately not a writer, it was a fun article to put together. Having the multiplier unlocked has definately helped with being able to oc this chip. I am still working my way up to see where it maxes at, I will update the article once I know the final results. Thanks for the comments.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|